Glossary

Definition

The accounting currency is the monetary unit a company uses to record its financial transactions and present its financial statements — also referred to as the reporting currency or presentation currency.

Why it matters

For any company operating across multiple countries, the choice of accounting currency sits at the heart of how financial performance is communicated to shareholders, regulators, and internal stakeholders. Because foreign-currency revenues, costs, and balance sheet items must ultimately be expressed in a single currency, the accounting currency determines how exchange rate movements show up — or don't — in reported results.

This is not a purely technical accounting decision. Exchange rate fluctuations between a company's functional currency (the currency of its primary economic environment) and its accounting currency can create significant volatility in reported earnings, even when the underlying business is performing well. A European exporter reporting in euros, for instance, may see its consolidated financials shift materially from quarter to quarter purely due to USD/EUR movements — without a single change in commercial performance.

Accounting currency vs. functional currency

The two terms are often used interchangeably, but they are distinct concepts. The functional currency is the currency in which a company primarily generates and expends its cash — it reflects economic reality and cannot be changed simply by management choice. The accounting currency, by contrast, is the currency in which financial statements are presented. In most cases they are the same, but a company may choose a different accounting currency — for example, when preparing consolidated reports for a parent entity domiciled in another country.

This distinction matters for FX risk management: translation risk arises precisely when a subsidiary's functional currency differs from the group's accounting currency, causing balance sheet and income statement items to fluctuate when restated.

Implications for FX risk management

Understanding your accounting currency is the necessary starting point for identifying which FX exposures require hedging. Companies need to map each foreign-currency cash flow back to the accounting currency to understand their true exposure — whether that is transactional risk (arising from individual invoices or payments), economic risk (arising from competitive dynamics), or translation risk (arising from the consolidation of overseas subsidiaries).

Automation plays an increasingly important role here. When hedging programmes are linked directly to ERP and treasury data, companies can ensure that every foreign-currency transaction is assessed, hedged, and reported in relation to the accounting currency in a consistent, auditable way.

• To understand how currency exposures feed into financial reporting, see Hedge Accounting Module — audit-ready hedge accounting reporting, integrated with your treasury workflows.
• Learn how automated hedging programmes protect reported results from exchange rate volatility: How Kantox Dynamic Hedging® works

‍

Accounts Payable

Accounts payable are short-term liabilities that arise when a company purchases goods, supplies, or services on credit — creating an obligation to pay a supplier at a future date.

When a business buys from an overseas supplier in a foreign currency, that obligation does not sit quietly on the balance sheet. From the moment the invoice is received to the moment payment is made, the amount owed in the company's functional currency fluctuates with exchange rate movements. A payable recorded at one rate may ultimately be settled at a significantly different one — and that gap flows directly through the income statement as a foreign exchange gain or loss.

How accounts payable work in practice

Accounts payable are typically recognised on the balance sheet at the point an invoice is received, not when payment is made. They are classified as current liabilities and generally carry no interest, distinguishing them from longer-term debt obligations. At each reporting date, any foreign currency payables must be revalued at the closing exchange rate — a process that can produce material unrealised FX gains or losses, depending on how the currency has moved.

Why accounts payable matter for FX risk management

For any company with international suppliers, accounts payable are a primary source of balance sheet FX exposure. Left unhedged, they introduce volatility into reported earnings that has nothing to do with the underlying business performance — a problem that CFOs and auditors alike are keen to eliminate.

This is where micro hedging becomes relevant. Together with accounts receivable, accounts payable are the key inputs when a company hedges balance sheet items at the individual transaction level. In a micro hedging programme, each foreign currency payable is matched with a corresponding hedging instrument — typically an FX forward — sized and timed to offset the revaluation risk on that specific liability. The goal is straightforward: ensure that what is owed in foreign currency translates to a predictable amount in the functional currency, regardless of how the market moves between invoice date and settlement.

Learn how micro hedging programmes work in practice: Balance Sheet Hedging

Automating this process — identifying payables, calculating exposure, executing hedges, and maintaining hedge accounting documentation — is precisely where Currency Management Automation software adds the most value. Manual workflows leave gaps; automation ensures that every eligible payable is captured, matched, and hedged consistently.

See how Kantox automates the hedging of foreign currency payables and receivables: Kantox Dynamic Hedging®.

Authorised Payment Institution: Definition & How It Works

An Authorised Payment Institution (API) is a non-bank financial firm that has been granted formal permission by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to provide payment services commercially, and whose authorisation is publicly recorded on the Financial Services Register.

Why the distinction matters for businesses

Not every company that moves money is a bank — and not every bank is the right partner for cross-border payments. Authorised Payment Institutions exist in the regulatory space between fully licensed banks and unregulated money-movers. They are subject to rigorous FCA oversight under the Payment Services Regulations, which means they must meet strict requirements around capital adequacy, safeguarding of client funds, and operational conduct.

For CFOs and Treasurers managing international payments, this distinction is practically important. Partnering with an FCA-authorised firm provides a meaningful layer of protection: client funds must be safeguarded separately from the institution's own capital, and the firm is accountable to a regulator with genuine enforcement powers.

What the FCA authorisation process involves

To become an Authorised Payment Institution, a firm must apply to the FCA and demonstrate compliance across several areas, including governance structures, risk management frameworks, and the technical and operational capacity to deliver payment services securely. Once authorised, the firm is listed on the FCA's publicly searchable Financial Services Register — a resource any business can use to verify the regulatory standing of a payments partner before engaging them.

This is distinct from firms that operate as registered (rather than authorised) small payment institutions, which face a lighter regulatory regime and are subject to volume thresholds. Authorised status signals a higher standard of regulatory commitment.

Relevance for corporate FX and treasury operations

When a business works with an Authorised Payment Institution for cross-border transactions, it is engaging with a regulated entity whose practices are subject to ongoing FCA supervision. This matters especially in the context of currency management, where the volume, frequency, and complexity of international payments can expose a company to both financial and operational risk if the payment provider is not properly regulated.

Kantox operates as an FCA-authorised firm, meaning the currency management automation services it provides — including the execution and settlement of FX transactions — are conducted within a fully regulated framework. This gives finance teams the confidence to automate payment workflows without compromising on regulatory integrity.

To understand how regulated payment infrastructure connects to broader FX strategy, see how Currency Management Automation brings together execution, hedging, and payments in a single framework.

For businesses reviewing their cross-border payment workflows, the Payments & Collections solution provides a practical starting point.

‍

The bid-ask spread is the difference between the price at which a bank or dealer will buy a currency (the bid) and the price at which it will sell that same currency (the ask or offer), and it represents the primary way in which financial institutions earn revenue on foreign exchange transactions.

In the foreign exchange market, currency prices are always quoted in pairs. A dealer quoting GBP/USD, for example, will simultaneously offer two rates: the rate at which they are prepared to purchase sterling, and the rate at which they are prepared to sell it. This dual-quote convention exists because a dealer rarely knows in advance whether a counterparty wishes to buy or sell. The first figure in a quote is always the bid (the lower of the two); the second is always the ask (the higher). A corporate treasurer buying sterling from a bank, therefore, will always pay the ask rate — typically the less favourable of the two prices.

To take a concrete example: if GBP/USD is quoted at 1.3018–1.3027, the bank is willing to buy sterling at 1.3018 and sell it at 1.3027. A company needing to purchase sterling will pay 1.3027, while a company selling sterling will receive only 1.3018. The spread of 0.0009 (or 9 pips) is retained by the bank as revenue — without any explicit commission charge.

Why the spread matters for corporate treasury

For companies engaged in cross-border trade, the bid-ask spread is a real and recurring cost of doing business in foreign currencies. On large or frequent transactions, even a narrow spread compounds into a meaningful drag on margins. In liquid currency pairs such as EUR/USD or GBP/USD, spreads tend to be tight; in less-traded pairs or during periods of market volatility, they widen considerably — increasing the cost of transacting at precisely the moments when certainty matters most.

Beyond transaction costs, the spread is also relevant when companies seek to lock in a budget rate or evaluate the performance of their FX programme. A company that hedges its currency exposure using forward contracts will encounter a spread on those transactions too, since forward rates are derived from spot rates with the same bid-offer structure.

The spread in the context of FX automation

One often-overlooked benefit of automating FX workflows is the improved consistency of execution. Manual FX processes — where deals are placed individually, often reactively — tend to result in higher effective spreads due to suboptimal timing and fragmented transaction sizes. Systematic hedging approaches, by contrast, allow companies to transact more predictably and at better rates over time.

Companies looking to reduce the total cost of their FX activity — including the hidden cost embedded in bid-ask spreads — may benefit from exploring how Currency Management Automation can bring discipline and efficiency to the entire hedging cycle.

‍